NSC Home Page
> EUAS Contents
> Research approach
INTRODUCTION
Research approach
The study builds particularly upon earlier research carried out by
the National Stone Centre (NSC) (see Appendix
3b) commissioned by BACMI (now part of QPA (1)), QPA (2), CBI and
English Nature (3) and individual companies in the industry. It is also
enhanced by NCS's experience gained in:
(a) Interpretive work and educational planning commissions conducted
for quarry companies and government environmental agencies in England
and Wales (4)
(b) Industrial training carried out by the NSC for the sector training
body (5)
(c) Hosting large numbers of educational groups (c200 pa) to the NSC
site and a nearby large operating quarry.
(d) Specific interviews with a representative cross section of:
i) major company, SMEs and trade federation personnel (6)
ii) teachers, adult education, university and college lecturers,
and LEAs (7)
iii) others with relevant experience in insurance, legal matters
and health and safety (8)
(e) Specific structured requests for information from:
(i) mineral planning officers (9)
(ii) Earth science teachers in tertiary education (10)
(f) Short surveys carried out of:
(i) Science textbooks
(ii) LEA Health and Safety Officers
Whenever possible formal surveys were avoided, particularly in respect
of approaches to industry. Apart from the generally poor level of responses
to conventional questionnaire, surveys, by the Spring of 2003, many
companies were experiencing 'survey fatigue', especially resulting from
ALSF supported initiatives by organisations, in some cases duplicating
work already researched in the past. Wide use was made of NSC's comprehensive
network of contacts, by face to face interviews, email, fax, telephone,
letter as well as library / internal file / web searches.
Consultees are listed in Appendix
2.
The research was mainly conducted by Ian Thomas, Director NSC, who
also led the Research Team (detailed in Appendix
3a). In should be noted that during the course of the project, there
were a significant number of unanticipated changes in the Team which
had important implications for the timing of the release of the findings.