During the preliminary lesson
Tell the students that next lesson they will be taking part in a
Public Inquiry about a proposed extension of a limestone quarry within
a National Park. Each student will need a copy of the General Briefing,
GB. See list at end of page.
Divide the class into seven groups. One group will play the role
of the Inspector and his or her assessors, and will organise the Inquiry.
The Inspector will act as a chairperson to control the proceedings.
Members of this 'Inspectors group' need copies of Briefing Sheet B1.
It is important to have students with appropriate personal qualities
(especially fairness and balance) in these roles, particularly for
the Inspector. (In a real public inquiry, assessors are present to
provide an objective (unbiased) input and comments, usually on complicated
points of science and technology. The inspector considers this information
alongside that presented by the proposers and objectors, and makes
an independent judgement on recommendations to government on what
should be done.)
Three groups will be in favour of the quarry extension. They will
represent Rock Quarry Holdings plc (abbreviated to RQH), who are the
quarry operators proposing the development ('the appellants'), the
industrial users of limestone, and the trades unions. They will need
briefing sheets B2, B3 and B4 respectively. See list at end of
page.
Three groups will oppose the extension ('the objectors'). They will
represent the National Park Authority, local residents and the local
conservation group. They will need briefing sheets B5, B6 and B7 respectively.
See list at end of page.
Issue each member of the class with copies of the general briefing
sheets (GB), and their specific briefing sheets (B1 to B7) according
to the group they are in. They should study these sheets in class
or for homework (or both). Students could use this time to research
the issues in greater depth than in the briefing sheets and possibly
see pictures of quarries on the internet, for example at www.qpa.org
(accessed July 2003); go to Lifezone and click on 'crushed rock'.
In school trials, it was found to be very important to allow plenty
of preparation time for students to assimilate the information and
discuss it together.
On the day of the Inquiry
Each group should first spend some time together using their briefing
sheets, their notes and other sources of information to plan how they
are going to present their arguments.
The Public Inquiry itself should, as far as possible, be organised
by the Inspector and his or her team. It may be better to do this
in a classroom or laboratory where there is movable furniture so that
the Inspector can arrange the seating suitably. The Inspector should
be encouraged to take firm control of the Inquiry to ensure everyone
gets a fair hearing.
A suggested sequence of events for the Inquiry is given in the Inspector's
briefing sheet (B1) where it is suggested that at the end of the proceedings
the inspector and assessors should draft a brief report giving their
conclusions and recommendations along with any conditions that should
be imposed if permission for the quarry is to be granted.
Students may suggest using Powerpoint® slides etc, for their
presentations. However impress on them that there are time limits
both for their preparation and for their presentation.
At the end of each presentation, copies should be given to the Inspector.
Further notes for teachers
As far as possible, the exercise has been modelled upon conventional
practices in planning, decision-making and particularly the appeals
process in England and Wales. The situation and terminology differs
but has parallels in Scotland and Northern Ireland. However, at the
time of revision (early 2003) major changes in the planning decision-making
process are in hand in England, but the appeals process is likely
to remain in this format.
The title 'Public Inquiry' is the legal term for an investigation
- conducted rather like a court, into proposals to carry out development
eg quarrying, building a retail park or to prepare a development plan.
The assessment criteria for mineral applications given in briefing
sheet GB3 are likely to be reviewed during 2003 and will be contained
in a new document.
Further resources
These may be useful for extension work or homework.
D J Harrison and K A McL. Adam, Limestones of the Peak : Mineral Assessment
Report 144, London: British Geological Survey / HMSO, 1985. This contains
detailed coloured maps of limestone by chemical purity in the Peak
District of Derbyshire and Staffordshire, the local geological structure,
data from boreholes and resource blocks and a brief resume of the
development of the industry in that area over the last 200 years.
It is an ideal source book and, while still in print, excellent value
at only £5.
Reports of the East Midlands Aggregates Working Party (EMAWP) carry
detailed statistics annually on the production, use and reserves of
limestone (and other aggregates) by county in the East Midlands (separate
figures also for Peak Limestone the Peak District National Park).
Similar reports also cover the smaller outcrop in Staffordshire (and
the rest of England and Wales) - available on www.planning.odpm.gov.uk/rawp/index.htm
(accessed June 2003) or EMAWP reports in hard copy from the publishers,
The National Stone Centre, Porter Lane, Wirksworth, Derbyshire DE4
4LS (Tel/fax: 01629 824833 and email nsc@nationalstonecentre.org.uk)
Useful information is available on various web sites showing satellite
photographs, aerial photographs and maps which indicate the positions
of quarries, (e.g. www.getmapping.com
(accessed June 2003) geology, www.bgs.ac.uk/mineralsuk/,
(accessed June 2003) and environment mapping at any scale for all
environmentally officially designated areas in England and Wales,
www.magic.gov.uk (accessed June
2003).
Acknowledgement
This material has been adapted (in 2003) to take account of recent
changes in procedure at planning inquiries and the industry by Ian
Thomas of the National Stone Centre, with permission, from SATIS No.
602 The Limestone Inquiry, Hatfield, Association for Science Education,
1986.
The JESEI project is very grateful to the Association for Science
Education for permission to adapt and update this resource.
Special note
The information contained in this activity is not intended to relate
to any particular organisation or area, but reflects current practice.
Planning legislation and procedures are currently undergoing major
changes at the time of writing.
|
Note on copyright
The copyright of the diagrams / figures
is retained by the National Stone Centre; they may only be used
and copied in connexion with this activity and within a teaching
/ learning context. They may not be used commercially or used,
adapted or published for any other purpose, without the written
consent of the National Stone Centre, Wirksworth, Derbyshire,
DE4 4LS.
|